I have only 64KB.TFM wrote: Please compare loading speed from real 3.5" disc on real CPC6128 with HxC. Needs 512 KB RAM.
Which sector interleaving should be used ?
I have only 64KB.TFM wrote: Please compare loading speed from real 3.5" disc on real CPC6128 with HxC. Needs 512 KB RAM.
Yes, we talked about that before. Therefore I did the tests. Targhans issue may be better or solved, but not my issue here, which is similar, but not the same.Jeff wrote:According to Targhan and my tests this is already solved.
Are you sure you are using the latest firmware and software version ?
Can you at least share the used dsk file ?
Is the issue specific to FutureOS ? If yes, i can't test/reproduce the issue nor correct it ... :-/
And so ? What is the difference ?TFM wrote: How to solve the problem? Read sectors from a physical disc in the order they appear, then do that with the HxC and you see the difference. Or do a read of multiple sector IDs.
Which one ?TFM wrote:dealing with the 765 will use similar techniques.
No. Once again this is not the issue here. And the fact that you don't see the issue with single sided images prove it.TFM wrote:The HxC's simulated head MOVES TOO SLOW! What can I tell more?